From: David Zaffiro <davzaffiro@tasking.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: waltabbyh@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:19:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F169437.8000802@_netscape_._net_> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F160965.7060403@comcast.net>
I don't think this has any to do with the calculation, you probably just have to use:
CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE=y
(well, combined with...
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ATARAID=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ATARAID_PDC=y
...and a lot of other options...)
With 2.4.20 the FORCE option had to be set at "n", now it should be set at "y".
> The calc_pdcblock_offset function calculates lba by taking the capacity
> of the drive and dividing it by (head * sector), multiplying the result
> times (head * sector) and subtracting the sector (SPT) count.
> Unfortunately, with the strange geometry reported by the new drive,
> using INTs to store these values will fail.
Avoiding floating-point precision, this would do the same as your calculation:
lba = ideinfo->capacity - ideinfo->sect;
However, I don't think the expression "fails". the way it is expressed now, it will divide something integer-wise and then multiply it with the same value (and then minus sect), thus I assume this was intended: To round the capacity value to the next multiple of (head * start), and then do a minus sect...
I don't think any hardcore programmer ever does a integerwise divide /before/ an integerwise multiply without a very good reason... (And don't give me that "you'd be surprised"!!!)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-17 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-17 2:26 [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry Walt H
2003-07-17 8:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-07-17 14:37 ` Walt H
2003-07-17 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-17 15:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-17 16:03 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-17 15:34 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-18 2:33 ` Walt H
2003-07-18 8:58 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-18 13:56 ` Walt H
2003-07-17 12:19 ` David Zaffiro [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-18 14:51 Walt H
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F169437.8000802@_netscape_._net_ \
--to=davzaffiro@tasking.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=waltabbyh@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.