From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:26:45 -0700
Message-ID: <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com>
References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15018-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs mailing list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Hans Reiser wrote:

> Please look at http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks/v4marks.html
>
> In brief, V4 is way faster than V3, and the wandering logs are indeed 
> twice as fast as fixed location logs when performing writes in large 
> batches.
>
<snip>
I am interested in testing this out, but the latest patch on the namesys 
sight appears to be against 2.5.60 which was never usable on my 
hardware. If there is a later patch, or if somebody has adapted it to 
work against 2.6.0-test1(or anything comparably recent), please let me know.

-Tupshin