From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tupshin Harper Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:32:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3F1FFBF9.2050308@tupshin.com> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> <1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost> <3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com> <1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost> <16159.48809.812634.455756@laputa.namesys.com> <3F1FF6DB.2090104@tupshin.com> <20030724152649.GB12647@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030724152649.GB12647@work.bitmover.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Larry McVoy Cc: Nikita Danilov , Shawn , Hans Reiser , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs mailing list Larry McVoy wrote: >On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:10:19AM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote: > > >>Nikita Danilov wrote: >> >> >> >>>Shawn writes: >>> >>> >>>>Looks like the 2.5.74 is the last one of any respectable size. I'm >>>>thinking someone forgot a diff switch (N?) over at namesys... >>>> >>>>Hans? Time to long-distance spank someone? >>>> >>>> >>>Can you try following the instructions on the >>>http://www.namesys.com/code.html (requires bitkeeper)? >>> >>>Nikita. >>> >>> >>> >>I'm sorry, but I don't have a bitkeeper license. Please let me know if a >>fixed patch is available. >> >> > >If someone can tell me what it is that you need and I'll do it and send you >a patch. I'm cloning that tree now. > > Thanks...I'm just interested in a working version of the reiser 4 patches to apply against 2.6.0-test1 or any other very recent tree. The version at ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp is incomplete. -Tupshin