From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: "Diego Calleja García" <diegocg@teleline.es>
Cc: Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: time for some drivers to be removed?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:02:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F201F1A.2010506@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030724193211.39d7ed68.diegocg@teleline.es>
Diego Calleja García wrote:
>El Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:34:44 +0200 Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl> escribió:
>
>
>
>>This would make a reasonable Q-requirement for 2.6.0 that at least the
>>kernel compiles with 'make allyesconfig'. The only thing open is to
>>
>>
>
>That 2.6.0 builds with 'make allyesconfig' or not is irrelevant.
>Moving broken drivers to a dark place doesn't fix them nor increase the
>"quality" level.....
>
>
It certainly improves perceived quality level. People new to linux
are going to think 2.6 is a pile of crap that will not compile. Not to
mention it reduces the possible things that can trip up a new
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-24 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-24 12:20 time for some drivers to be removed? Robert P. J. Day
2003-07-24 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-24 15:34 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-24 17:32 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-07-24 17:50 ` Robert P. J. Day
2003-07-24 19:16 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-07-24 19:43 ` Robert P. J. Day
2003-07-24 18:02 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-07-24 19:07 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-25 10:48 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-27 15:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-27 15:59 ` David D. Hagood
2003-07-27 16:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-27 16:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 17:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-27 18:45 ` David D. Hagood
2003-07-27 20:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 20:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-07-27 20:56 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-28 2:23 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-07-29 19:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-13 20:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-09 18:04 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-09 19:36 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-24 14:43 John Bradford
2003-07-24 19:24 ` Brian Jackson
2003-07-24 18:29 John Bradford
2003-07-24 18:31 ` Robert P. J. Day
2003-07-24 19:31 ` Eli Carter
2003-07-25 10:48 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-25 11:10 John Bradford
2003-07-27 16:22 John Bradford
2003-07-28 7:12 linux
2003-08-05 12:42 Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-05 13:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-05 13:35 ` Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-05 13:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-05 14:01 ` Mikael Pettersson
2003-08-06 10:06 ` Claus-Justus Heine
2003-08-09 19:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-05 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-05 18:47 ` Leopold Gouverneur
2003-08-13 20:55 John Bradford
2003-08-13 20:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-08-13 20:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-14 5:34 John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F201F1A.2010506@rackable.com \
--to=sflory@rackable.com \
--cc=diegocg@teleline.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ml@basmevissen.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.