From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:39:38 -0700
Message-ID: <3F20440A.6060009@tupshin.com>
References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com>	<3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com>	<1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost>	<3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com>	<1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost>	<16159.48809.812634.455756@laputa.namesys.com>	<3F1FF6DB.2090104@tupshin.com> <20030724173312.367353d7.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <3F1FFF90.9010104@tupshin.com> <3F2002EC.1050801@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15040-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <3F2002EC.1050801@gmx.net>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Philippe_Gramoull=E9?= <philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:

>Tupshin Harper wrote:
> =20
>
>>Philippe Gramoull=E9 wrote:
>>
>>   =20
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>You don't need one for testing reiserfs v4.
>>>
>>>Just download the bitkeeper software [1] Last time i did it
>>>i had to enter my email then i would receive the instructions to be able
>>>to download it ( login and password )
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Philippe
>>>
>>>[1] http://www.bitmover.com/cgi-bin/download.cgi
>>>
>>>=20
>>>
>>>     =20
>>>
>>Uhh...no. I have recently decided to contribute to the arch SCM project,
>>so I am legally unable to use BitKeeper's free license which you have to
>>agree to in order to download and use it.
>>   =20
>>
>
>Quoting from http://linux.bkbits.net/stats.html:
>
>Wed Jul 23 17:30:55 PDT 2003	tupshin	bastard.(none)
>/usr/src/bks/linux-2.4	linux-2.4	2700	outgoing pull
>
>This is another Tupshin?
>
>
>Confused,
>Carl-Daniel
>
> =20
>
No confusion...just that the "recently" was in fact a decision I made=20
yesterday. I had used bitkeeper a few different times since it was=20
touted as the easiest way to get the latest kernel snapshots, and I had=20
previously no intention of working on any SCM project. However, I joined=20
the arch mailing list about a week ago, and last night I decided to=20
start coding a few changes that will make it suit my needs a bit better.=20
I have no idea if these changes will be incorporated into arch, and they=20
don't have any overlap with bitkeeper functionality. However, I must=20
abide by the bitkeeper license now that I have made that decision. I=20
will be pulling linux kernels from the cvs exported version from here on=20
out, and I will probably re-import it into arch in order to maintain a=20
local kernel tree.

-Thanks
-Tupshin