All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Karnik <rahul@genebrew.com>
To: Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>
Cc: Marcelo Penna Guerra <eu@marcelopenna.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Laurens <masterpe@xs4all.nl>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:48:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F23BC1D.7070804@genebrew.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307271222.13649.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>

Andrew de Quincey wrote:

> Ah, so THATS who they licensed it from. I didn't think nividia would go to the 
> bother of designing their own ethernet hardware.

Actually, this is not certain, but it is one of the guesses. So far, 
Nforce2 = AMD IDE + Intel sound + <unknown> ethernet.

-Rahul


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-27 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-26 22:09 [PATCH] nvidia nforce 1.0-261 nvnet for kernel 2.5 Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27  4:50 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27  4:56 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27  2:26   ` Marcelo Penna Guerra
2003-07-27  5:59     ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27  9:16       ` Laurens
2003-07-27 10:37         ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 11:19       ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 11:22       ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 11:48         ` Rahul Karnik [this message]
2003-07-27 11:46           ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 12:02           ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 13:36             ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 14:01             ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 14:14               ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27 14:44                 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 15:46                   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-27 16:28                     ` Rahul Karnik
2003-07-27 19:51                       ` Laurens
2003-07-28  1:09             ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-27 23:11               ` Marcelo Penna Guerra
2003-07-28  8:53                 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-07-27  5:53   ` Brian Jackson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-29  8:44 Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F23BC1D.7070804@genebrew.com \
    --to=rahul@genebrew.com \
    --cc=adq_dvb@lidskialf.net \
    --cc=eu@marcelopenna.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masterpe@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.