From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:01:46 +0400 Message-ID: <3F23DB4A.7060801@namesys.com> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> <1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost> <3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com> <1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost> <16159.48809.812634.455756@laputa.namesys.com> <3F23C588.10700@namesys.com> <20030727124547.GD24002@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030727124547.GD24002@louise.pinerecords.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Tomas Szepe Cc: Nikita Danilov , Shawn , Tupshin Harper , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs mailing list Tomas Szepe wrote: >>[reiser@namesys.com] >> >>Nikita, how about phrasing this as: >> >> `Dear and esteemed potential Reiser4 user, I apologize that we put a >>tarball on our website and let it get so obsolete, thereby wasting your >>time. I am deleting it now, and will soon put a new one up. In the >>meantime, can you use bitkeeper if that is convenient for you? Here is >>the URL with the instructions for doing that.....' >> >>It is the usual American business english used in such cases.;-) >> >> > >Standard American puke inducing pretentious florid business >language if you want to be completely accurate. 8) > > > Yeah, but Nikita really could have been more helpful.... -- Hans