From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:30:35 +0400
Message-ID: <3F25095B.6070607@namesys.com>
References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com>	 <1059062380.29238.260.camel@sonja>	 <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com>	 <1059093594.29239.314.camel@sonja>	 <16161.10863.793737.229170@laputa.namesys.com>	 <1059142851.6962.18.camel@sonja>	 <1059143985.19594.3.camel@haron.namesys.com>	 <1059181687.10059.5.camel@sonja>	 <1059203990.21910.13.camel@haron.namesys.com>	 <1059228808.10692.7.camel@sonja>  <3F23D38B.3020309@namesys.com> <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15092-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
Cc: Yury Umanets <umka@namesys.com>, Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>, Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, reiserfs mailing list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>, Alexander Lyamin <flx@namesys.com>

Daniel Egger wrote:

>Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
>have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
>difference between those two.
>
I am told that they do by flx.  After all, they are most used for the 
FAT filesystem.


-- 
Hans