From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpout1.tiscali.be (cpout1.tiscali.be [62.235.13.193]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE9C4848 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:15:30 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:15:28 +0200 Message-ID: <3F2A5B0400003183@ocpmta1.freegates.net> In-Reply-To: <20030814152348.GA17578@dsl2.external.hp.com> From: "Joel Soete" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] itlb miss handler optimizations! To: "Grant Grundler" Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >> >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:56:42PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: >> In the 2 cases, if a fault occurs an interrupt (6, 15, 16,17 or 20) is >> 'triggered'? >> >yes, but most people call them "traps" or "faults" to be more specific. >Chapter 5 of the PA 2.0 arch book differentiates nicely. Yes (that is from where came 6,15,.. reference). Oh yes, my bad: I didn't notice that here interrupt is not the shortcut of interruptions as I use to make the mishmash :( Thanks, Joel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tiscali ADSL, seulement 35 eur/mois et le modem est inclus...abonnez-vous! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr