From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Cc: Patrick Moor <pmoor@netpeople.ch>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: time jumps (again)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:38:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F2EE053.1020600@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0308042347300.12309-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Tim Schmielau wrote:
>>Some days ago I started noticing strange time jumps on my Athlon system.
>>(Asus board, VIA chipset, AMD Athlon 650MHz processor). I haven't
>>noticed them before and I am pretty sure there weren't any for the last
>>few years! Uptime of the machine is now 218 days, and problems began
>>appearing after 215 days approximately.
>>
>>What happens: when doing a
>> $ while true; do date; done
>>I'm noticing time jumps _exactly_ at the beginning of a "new" second (or
>>at the end of an "old" one). the jump is exactly 4294 (4295) seconds
>>into the future. Example:
>>...
>>Mon Aug 4 18:11:06 CEST 2003
>>Mon Aug 4 18:11:06 CEST 2003
>>Mon Aug 4 19:22:41 CEST 2003
>>Mon Aug 4 19:22:41 CEST 2003
>>Mon Aug 4 19:22:41 CEST 2003
>>Mon Aug 4 18:11:07 CEST 2003
>>Mon Aug 4 18:11:07 CEST 2003
>>...
>>
>
>
> Wild guess - does the following patch fix it?
And your theory is that wall_jiffies > jiffies. How does this happen?
Both of these are only changed under the write_irq lock....
I would feel better with a patch that made jiffies volatile, but it
already is.
I agree that the jump implies overflow here, but just HOW is it happening?
Time for some dianostic code...
Tim
>
>
> --- linux-2.4.20/arch/i386/kernel/time.c.orig Mon Aug 4 23:38:47 2003
> +++ linux-2.4.20/arch/i386/kernel/time.c Mon Aug 4 23:40:53 2003
> @@ -274,8 +274,8 @@
> read_lock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
> usec = do_gettimeoffset();
> {
> - unsigned long lost = jiffies - wall_jiffies;
> - if (lost)
> + long lost = jiffies - wall_jiffies;
> + if (lost>0)
> usec += lost * (1000000 / HZ);
> }
> sec = xtime.tv_sec;
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-04 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-04 16:35 time jumps (again) Patrick Moor
2003-08-04 16:37 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-04 21:49 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-08-04 22:38 ` george anzinger [this message]
2003-08-05 1:08 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-06 18:16 ` Timothy Miller
2003-08-06 18:55 ` George Anzinger
2003-08-07 0:29 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-05 10:32 ` Jan Niehusmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F2EE053.1020600@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoor@netpeople.ch \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.