From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: rebuild fs Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:56:55 +0400 Message-ID: <3F2FA997.20101@namesys.com> References: <20030805104546.GA22557@namesys.com> <3F2FA2DF.3050505@namesys.com> <20030805125431.GE13689@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030805125431.GE13689@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Thorsten Mauch , "'reiserfs-list@namesys.com'" Oleg Drokin wrote: >Hello! > >On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:28:15PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>>>But while rebuilding the tree, I got a segmentation fault. Because I >>>>didn't >>>>want to continue work on the original raid system, I copied the entire >>>>raid >>>>disk to the IDE disk. >>>>dd if=/dev/rd/c0d0 of=/dev/hda conv=noerror,sync >>>>I tried to rebuild the fs structure again, and I was able to access many >>>>files, but not that are important to me :( >>>>Does there is anyting I can do in this state ? does other tools then >>>>resierfsck exist ? >>>> >>>> >>>If you are not using latest fsck version (3.6.11 as of now), try to use >>>reiserfsprogs 3.6.11, >>>as there is slight chance it would do better. >>> >>> >>rephrase that as, use 3.6.11, if it still fails, tell us, the segfault >>will at least be fixed regardless of whether fsck has enough data to do >>its job. >> >> > >But it was not failing on the IDE drive anyway. > >Bye, > Oleg > > > > I don't understand the relevance of your statement to mine. -- Hans