From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Filesystem Tests Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 16:55:41 +0400 Message-ID: <3F324C4D.9000008@namesys.com> References: <3F306858.1040202@mrs.umn.edu> <20030805224152.528f2244.akpm@osdl.org> <3F310B6D.6010608@namesys.com> <20030806183410.49edfa89.diegocg@teleline.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030806183410.49edfa89.diegocg@teleline.es> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"; format="flowed" To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Diego_Calleja_Garc=EDa?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Diego Calleja Garc=EDa wrote: >El Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:06:37 +0400 Hans Reiser escrib= i=F3: > > =20 > >>I don't think ext2 is a serious option for servers of the sort that=20 >>Linux specializes in, which is probably why he didn't measure it. >> =20 >> > >Why? > Run fsck on a 1 terabyte array while a department waits for their server=20 to come back up instead of having it back in 90 seconds and..... disk speeds have increased linearly while their capacity has increased=20 quadratically. --=20 Hans