From: "Steve French (IBM LTC)" <smfltc@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: quota woes
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:54:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F36A2EC.EC77B3FF@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Experimenting with Linux quotas for network filesystems is turning out
to be painful. I have not been able to experiment with the parms
passed in from the quota calls invoked by the common Linux/Unix quota
tools (quotacheck, quotaon, quotacheck) due to what looks like bugs in
the Linux quota tools (the only source I could find for these tools was
out on the sourceforge project). Even for the new xfs style quota
interface they refuse to handle a deviceless (network) filesystem mount
properly even after modifying the quota tools code to make the cifs vfs
treated like XFS (the only one that seems to invoke the new quota call
format). After changing the tool to recognize my filesystem name as a
valid one (they hardcode the actual valid filesystem names in the quota
tools on sourceforge!) it still fails to invoke my test code due to
mismatch on devnumber (network filesystems don't have real device
numbers for each mount). I had been hoping to experiment with the
current stub quota routines (in preparation for adding remote quota
support to cifs filesystem in the long run) that I added to the cifs
vfs source in the cifs bitkeeper tree a few days ago, eventually these
could call the server to get/set the quotas by specifying a valid SID
which is also an interesting problem because that requires either an IPC
to Winbind or upcall to a user space daemon to do mapping of local to
domain identity (to be exact mapping the Linux UID to domain SID)
Is there another source of quota tools that calls the newer quota
interface that would not require validating mount's local device numbers
before invoking the kernel quotactl interface?"
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-10 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-10 19:54 Steve French (IBM LTC) [this message]
2003-08-11 1:24 ` quota woes Nathan Scott
2003-08-12 12:23 ` Jan Kara
2003-08-12 23:05 ` Nathan Scott
2003-08-13 15:50 ` Steve French (IBM LTC)
2003-08-13 20:04 ` Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F36A2EC.EC77B3FF@us.ibm.com \
--to=smfltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.