All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Brad Parker <brad@parker.boston.ma.us>
Subject: Re: Questions about ARP
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:39:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F390A32.5040507@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F38DEC4.8050708@imc-berlin.de


Steven Scholz wrote:

> Windows is checking for duplicate addresses using ARP packets with
> source _and_
> destination address set to the address in question. So of course Linux
> won't answer it!
>
> But I can't find a single word in the RFC2131
> (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2131.html)
> saying that the Source Address _must_ set to 0.0.0.0!!!!

I don't remember if it was in RFC2131 or RFC1541.  RFC2131 is an updated
version of RFC1541, so I thought the words would still be there.  In
any case it suggests as part of a DHCP the client tests to ensure the
address isn't already in use by sending a ARP using the sender hardware
address and setting the sender IP address to zero to avoid confusing
ARP caches in other hosts on the network.  I don't remember the exact
words, but RFCs tend to be terse and concise in the area where you
need to pay attention to detail :-)

I'd suggest using the linux kernel or some networking mailing lists
to discuss this.  I wouldn't apply this patch because it seems to be
wrong in the eyes of the RFCs, and I could never get it pushed into
the network portion of the source tree.

Thanks.


	-- Dan


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-12 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-08 15:04 Questions about ARP Steven Scholz
2003-08-08 18:24 ` Dan Malek
2003-08-12 12:34   ` Steven Scholz
2003-08-12 13:56     ` Build issues with 2.6.0-test3 Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:25       ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39         ` Matt Porter
2003-08-12 15:40         ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:46           ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 19:13             ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 21:54               ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 23:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-08-12 22:23                   ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39     ` Dan Malek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-12 14:05 Questions about ARP Dave Ellis
2003-08-12 15:40 ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F390A32.5040507@embeddededge.com \
    --to=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=brad@parker.boston.ma.us \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.