From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jose Alberto Guzman <jose@iteso.mx>
Subject: LVM(1|2) vs EVMS
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:40:30 -0500
Message-ID: <3F3C0FDE.4000900@iteso.mx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15310-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com


  What would be the recommended volume management system for an smp=20
production server running oracle 8i (later 9i) on 2.4.20 or 2.4.21=20
debian gnu/linux with reiserfs: lvm1, lvm2 or evms ??

  Solid stability under heavy load and snapshots are the main needed=20
features.

  What would you suggest?



  Jos=E9