All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Massimiliano Cuzzoli <mcuzzoli@mbigroup.it>
To: Sumit Pandya <sumit@elitecore.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Problem with extended-match deletion
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:37:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F422834.3020702@mbigroup.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <012a01c36651$0889f970$010f430a@elite.co.in>

Hi Sumit,
I try to write a kernel module similar to ipt_limit.c:

-->>> My match structure is:
struct ipt_bwctrl_info {
   unsigned long rate;  /* in Kbit/sec */
   unsigned long mark;
   unsigned long burst; /* in Kbit */

   unsigned long old_tstamp;
   unsigned long bit_burst; /* in bit */
   unsigned long bit_bonus; /* in bit */
   unsigned long bit_per_jiffy; /* in bit */

   /* As master field of ipt_limit.h !!!! */
   struct ipt_bwctrl_info *original;
};

-->>> My check_entry function:
static int bwcontrol_checkentry(const char *tablename, const struct 
ipt_ip *ip,
				void *matchinfo, unsigned int matchsize,
				unsigned int hookmask) {

   struct ipt_bwctrl_info *bw_info;

   if (matchsize!=IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ipt_bwctrl_info))) {
     return(0);
   }

   bw_info=(struct ipt_bwctrl_info *) matchinfo;

   /* Init *bw_info fields... */
   /* ........................*/

   bw_info->original=bw_info; /* for SMP */

   return(1);
}

-->>> My match function:
static int bwcontrol_match(const struct sk_buff *skb,
			   const struct net_device *in,
			   const struct net_device *out,
			   const void *matchinfo, int offset,
			   const void *hdr, u_int16_t datalen,
			   int *hotdrop) {

   struct ipt_bwctrl_info *bw_info;

   bw_info=((struct ipt_bwctrl_info *) matchinfo)->original; /*for SMP*/

   spin_lock_bh(&bwcontrol_lock); /* SMP lock */

   /* Match controls ......... */
   /* ........................ */

   spin_unlock_bh(&bwcontrol_lock); /* SMP unlock */

   return(1);
}

Regards.

Sumit Pandya has wrote:
>>Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:34:40 +0200
>>From: Massimiliano Cuzzoli <mcuzzoli@mbigroup.it>
>>
>>Hi all,
> 
> Hi
> 
>>I've wrote a new match for iptables 1.2.7a.
> 
> Will you write more details? Some of its intended purpose ;-)
> 
>>All features, that I've implemented in it, run very well but
>>there is a problem when I try to remove the rule with my match.
> 
> Are you sure you not changing (void*) matchinfo structure from matchentry
> function within kernel module?
> 
>>Can Anybody help me???
> 
> Hope this helps :-)
> -- Sumit

       reply	other threads:[~2003-08-19 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030819102424.16725.44717.Mailman@kashyyyk>
     [not found] ` <012a01c36651$0889f970$010f430a@elite.co.in>
2003-08-19 13:37   ` Massimiliano Cuzzoli [this message]
     [not found]     ` <018401c36659$e505a220$010f430a@elite.co.in>
2003-08-19 14:14       ` Problem with extended-match deletion Massimiliano Cuzzoli
2003-08-18 15:34 Massimiliano Cuzzoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F422834.3020702@mbigroup.it \
    --to=mcuzzoli@mbigroup.it \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=sumit@elitecore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.