From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bas Mevissen Subject: Re: Cpufreq for 2.4: what is the best source? Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:07:11 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <3F44A7DF.4040705@basmevissen.nl> References: <3F3CB378.1000607@basmevissen.nl> <20030815154156.GA1029@brodo.de> <3F409E54.20001@basmevissen.nl> <20030818175357.GC1570@brodo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030818175357.GC1570@brodo.de> Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: Bas Mevissen , Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Already done. As Dave's site isn't yet back online, it can temporarily be > accessed at > http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq_tmp/cpufreq-2.4.22-rc2-1__.gz > How up to date is this one? It looks like it doesn't work with a ICH4 P4-M combination. With 2.6.0-test3 it works out of the box. With speedstep_ich.o and (..._lib.o) loaded, I get: cd /proc/sys/cpu ; cat * 2000000 # speed_max, which is correct 0 # speed_min 0 # spped_max BTW where can I find documentation about how to set a different policy with the patch above? The documentation in the tree deliberately doesn't detail it... (I mean setting the policy with e.g. echo userspace >/proc/cpufreq) Bas.