From: mds@paradyne.com (Mark D. Studebaker )
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c driver changes 2.6.0-test3
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F47B457.10805@paradyne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060972405413@kroah.com>
agreed. it causes lots of problems, e.g. "I loaded your driver and my PC beeped like crazy and then shut down".
should we do this for 2.8.1?
Jean Delvare wrote:
>>Why don't we just make it policy that now and in the future we don't
>>initialize the limits on the sensors?
>>(...)
>
>
> I think I agree. As long as it doesn't cause extra problems, I believe
> the drivers should be kept as simple and "neutral" as possible. If
> certain drivers really have to intialize limits for any reason, it's OK,
> but I don't object against the default policy being to not initialize.
>
> (Which doesn't mean I'll rush to remove initializations in "my"
> drivers".)
>
>
>>We don't know in what crazy way a motherboard manufacturer may have
>>wired or scaled the inputs and with the newer sensors, it's leading to
>>shutdowns and fan spinup behavior that is "less than optimal".
>
>
> In this precise case, the reason is not initializing, but initializing
> with awful values. That's different.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-15 18:32 [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.0-test3 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` [PATCH] i2c driver changes 2.6.0-test3 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-08-15 18:33 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Philip Pokorny
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker [this message]
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-10 23:10 [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.0-test7 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-10-10 23:11 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-10-10 23:11 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-10-10 23:11 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-10-10 23:11 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:28 [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.0-test5 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-22 23:30 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-23 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-09-23 16:19 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-23 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-09-23 19:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2003-09-23 19:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-08-02 5:29 [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.0-test2 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-08-14 5:13 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-08-14 21:14 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` [BK PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.0-test5 Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F47B457.10805@paradyne.com \
--to=mds@paradyne.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.