From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: policy routing on locally generated packets Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:17:10 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3F4B5DD6.7080503@trash.net> References: <1061813400.1289.36.camel@drs0.manchotnetworks.net> <3F4A01BE.1090805@trash.net> <3F4A2795.3030805@trash.net> <1061837608.1333.9.camel@drs0.manchotnetworks.net> <20030825190750.GH423@oknodo.bof.de> <1061887675.1273.37.camel@drs0.manchotnetworks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick Schaaf , netfilter-devel Return-path: To: "lartc@manchotnetworks.net" In-Reply-To: <1061887675.1273.37.camel@drs0.manchotnetworks.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org lartc@manchotnetworks.net wrote: >My issue arises from ip accounting -- that is -- each user on a linux >box must have their wire traffic accounted for. As in the first message >of the thread: > Why don't add routes without specifing a source and nat the packets to the prefered address ? Also, for accounting purposes the byte counters of the matching rule should be fine i would think .. ? Bye Patrick