From: Valmar Joandi <valmar@linking.ee>
To: hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:53:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4DFB44.2080802@linking.ee> (raw)
Hi.
Has there been any changes recently? I search with google for that patch
but could'nt find anything, maybe I missed something?
And how about 2.6 kernel + 1210sa + sata seagate 120G?
-----------------------------FWD
MESSAGE--------------------------------------------------
Re: 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G
From: Hugo Mills (hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:44:01 EST
* Next message: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: [PATCH] Synaptics: support for
pass-through port (stick)"
* Previous message: Doug McNaught: "Re: question about linux tcp
request queue handling"
* In reply to: Elmer: "2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt ,
Seagate 120G"
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:42:32AM +0300, Elmer wrote:
> Tried them on every imaginable way:
>
> 1. 2.4.21 + my own siimage slight patch, 2.4.21 + simage from ac4,
> pure 2.4.21-ac4
> 2. apic, noapic, localapic
> 3. uni,smp motherboards, 4 of them
> 4. modules, compiled in,
> 5. all of options from cards bios
>
> /proc/interrupts reports 0 interrupts for ide2,3 , whatever I do.
>
> after bootup, after attacking ide-disk driver, there are lost interrupts.
> it recognises disk as correct type, but no communication except:
>
> 1. under XP it works (but there was no linux at that mb)
> 2. hdparm lets change few flags under linux, but no -X succeeds
> 3. after waiting for minute those timeouts and booting up, then
> /proc/ide/ide2/hde/* reports sensible correct information
>
> I have the card for few more days, anything to try ?
I've tried this card with all of the hdparm options that I could
think of. I got no success either. However, Andre Hedrick claims[1] to
have got the SiI3112 and 3114 working in his tree (a couple of weeks
ago). He's testing it[2] before release.
Hugo.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105622034606015&w=2
[2] I believe that one of the tests is whether he's got paid for the
work by the people who contracted him to do it, which is where I
suspect the real delay is.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- If it ain't broke, hit it again. ---
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-28 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-28 12:53 Valmar Joandi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-07 21:42 2.4.21-ac4 Adaptec 1210SA lost interrupt , Seagate 120G Elmer
2003-07-07 22:44 ` Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F4DFB44.2080802@linking.ee \
--to=valmar@linking.ee \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.