From: Andrey Tverdokhleb <at@tigry.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Is there way to bypass conntrack?
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:47:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F56291A.90003@tigry.net> (raw)
I'd really like to have some way to bypass ip_conntrack for some
packets. Basically I need to run very intensive port scanning through my
firewall and as soon as ip_conntrack loaded it dies within seconds from
syn flood. Increase limit doesnt work becuase I need about 127000
packets to be sent from different source ports. So far I just keep
contrack unloaded and firewall works fine as pure stateless filter. But
now I need statefull inspection on this machine for some IPs. So the
question - is it possible to avoid connection tracking for some specific
IPs?
Thanks!
Andrey
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-03 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-03 17:47 Andrey Tverdokhleb [this message]
2003-09-04 17:52 ` Is there way to bypass conntrack? Julian Gomez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F56291A.90003@tigry.net \
--to=at@tigry.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.