From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Re: Where will it live Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:39:04 -0700 Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F567B98.7070105@zytor.com> References: <1062629918.4476.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1062629918.4476.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: autofs mailing list , Ian Kent Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 06:25, Ian Kent wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Soon there will be a release of autofs-4.0.0 and shortly after >>autofs-4.1.0-beta1. >> >>This raises the question of where the packages should live. There is >>also the question of whether we should have a CVS repository available. >> >>Comments/suggestions/offers please? > > I was thinking about hosting it on bkbits. I've been using BK for other > projects lately, and it is very nice. SF has been a bit of a dog > lately, particularly for anon-CVS. > You're also locking out potential developers, due to LM's "if I don't like you you can't use it" license clause. Agreed with SF being slow for anoncvs. There is also Savannah (savannah.gnu.org/savannah.nongnu.org). Obviously for posting packages there is kernel.org, as before; unfortunately we don't really have the human resources at this time to set up SCM repositories. -hpa