From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: precise characterization of ext3 atomicity Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 01:03:03 +0400 Message-ID: <3F57A887.9040706@namesys.com> References: <3F574A49.7040900@namesys.com> <20030904085537.78c251b3.akpm@osdl.org> <3F576176.3010202@namesys.com> <20030904091256.1dca14a5.akpm@osdl.org> <3F57676E.7010804@namesys.com> <20030904181540.GC13676@matchmail.com> <3F578656.60005@namesys.com> <20030904191255.GE13676@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030904191255.GE13676@matchmail.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mike Fedyk Cc: Andrew Morton , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Fedyk wrote: >On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:37:10PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>Mike Fedyk wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:25:18PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>In data=journal and data=ordered modes ext3 also guarantees that the >>>>metadata will be committed atomically with the data they point to. >>>>However ext3 does not provide user data atomicity guarantees beyond the >>>>scope of a single filesystem disk block (usually 4 kilobytes). If a >>>>single write() spans two disk blocks it is possible that a crash partway >>>>through the write will result in only one of those blocks appearing in >>>>the file after recovery. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>And how does reiser4 do this without changing the userspace apps? >>> >>> >>> >>We don't. We just make the hovercraft, we don't force you to go over >>the water..... >> >> > >So by default with no user space modifications, reiser4 will be atomic for >each write() call, and ext3 will if it aligns withing a single page. > >Is that correct? > Yes. > >Then you can go on to specify that you can have larger transactions if you >make some changes to the userspace apps. > > > > or you are a programmer who writes code....;-) It's not that hard to write code....;-) -- Hans