From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl>
Subject: Re: Which cpufreq driver is best for ...
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 10:15:03 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <3F584607.1060705@basmevissen.nl>
References: <20030903055749.GA21721@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20030903192749.GA30360@brodo.de> <3F5731DD.8050700@basmevissen.nl>
	<20030904232757.GA8665@brodo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20030904232757.GA8665@brodo.de>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:36:45PM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> 
>>Maybe this (together with your extensive explanation in this thread) can 
>>be FAQ-ed. With a good explanation of the power saving models (clock 
>>modulation, clock modification&voltage scaling, cpu idling) a lot of 
>>questions can be answered.
> 
> Have you got some spare time? If so, a patch / file with such a FAQ /
> summary would be greatly appreciated.
> 

I don't really have much spare time, but it is a matter of priority :-)
So I'll write something in the next week. I hope people are willing to 
review it.

Regards,

Bas.