From: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:57:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F6208F6.2080508@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F611BE8.6040900@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Which version of autofs are you running? What version of mount(8)?
>
autofs-3.1.7 and mount-2.11g
> It's possible NFS lets you umount a mount which has busy inodes under
> certain conditions.
Are you thinking of the MNT_FORCE flag ? I have reasons to believe that it won't help. Mainly because if it was a RPC task that marked the inode busy, it'd have put itself on the waitq of the inode. However I found that waitqueue_active(&inode->i_wait) == 0.
-Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-12 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-12 0:11 VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP Arun Sharma
2003-09-12 1:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-12 14:23 ` Ryan Go
2003-09-12 17:57 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2003-09-12 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-12 23:33 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-13 0:08 ` Arun Sharma
2003-09-13 0:16 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-13 0:16 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-15 21:42 ` [NFS] " Arun Sharma
2003-09-15 22:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-15 22:34 ` Arun Sharma
2003-09-15 23:42 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-16 1:34 ` [autofs] " Matt C
2003-09-16 1:34 ` Matt C
2003-09-19 2:57 ` Frank Cusack
2003-09-16 20:37 ` Re: [NFS] " Arun Sharma
2003-09-16 20:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-17 0:28 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-17 2:05 ` Arun Sharma
2003-09-17 2:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-17 4:56 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-17 4:52 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-17 17:47 ` Arun Sharma
2003-09-17 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-17 21:00 ` Olaf Hering
2003-09-18 0:31 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-18 5:04 ` Olaf Hering
2003-09-18 5:52 ` Re: [autofs] " Trond Myklebust
2003-09-18 8:26 ` Olaf Kirch
2003-09-19 23:36 ` [NFS] " Olaf Hering
2003-09-25 23:17 ` Re: [autofs] " Matt C
2003-09-25 23:17 ` Matt C
2003-09-26 0:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-26 0:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-26 18:31 ` [NFS] " Ion Badulescu
2003-09-26 22:29 ` Re: [autofs] " Trond Myklebust
2003-09-27 16:55 ` Olaf Kirch
2003-09-28 23:16 ` Steve Fosdick
2003-09-29 12:07 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-29 17:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-30 12:50 ` Olaf Kirch
2003-09-30 13:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-29 3:27 ` Frank Cusack
2003-09-18 2:26 ` [NFS] " Ion Badulescu
2003-09-18 2:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-29 12:19 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-30 12:24 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-30 12:51 ` Mike Waychison
2003-10-01 12:56 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-30 13:12 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-30 16:44 ` Ian Kent
2003-09-17 13:14 ` Ryan Go
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F6208F6.2080508@intel.com \
--to=arun.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.