From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rfc: test whether a device has a partition table
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:27:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F72447C.4000909@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030925010052.GD7665@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1577 bytes --]
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:42:44AM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
>>I have a USB 500 MB USB key that confuses linux (both 2.4 and
>>2.6) since it has no partition table. It shows up on my laptop as:
>
>
> Confuses it in which sense?
Al,
Under lk 2.4 (rh9) this is in my log:
Sep 25 10:37:53 localhost kernel: SCSI device sda: 1024000 512-byte hdwr
sectors (524 MB)
Sep 25 10:37:53 localhost kernel: sda: Write Protect is off
Sep 25 10:37:53 localhost kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
Attached is sector 0 of the device and the output of
"fdisk -l".
lk 2.6.0-test5-bk10 also thinks the device has 4 malformed
partitions.
>>$ cat /proc/scsi/scsi
>>Attached devices:
>>Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
>> Vendor: Prolific Model: USBFlashDisk Rev: 1.00
>> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>>
>>I can mount it with:
>>$ mount /dev/sda /mnt/extra
>
>
> So it works fine. what's the problem?
It is non obvious. W2K and XP handled the USB key without
a problem. An organisation bought a bunch of these USB
"floppies" and expected them to work with linux (like
other USB mass storage devices they had experienced). I
was given one to find out what was wrong ...
BTW Another interesting aspect of this USB key is that
some sectors read before they are ever written can give
a "medium error, unrecoverable read". Once the sector
is written the problem goes away. This shouldn't be a
problem in normal use. [I guess at least sector 0 is
written in the factory :-) ]
Doug Gilbert
[-- Attachment #2: prolific_sect0.img.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 525 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: fdisk.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1536 bytes --]
Disk /dev/sda: 524 MB, 524288000 bytes
17 heads, 59 sectors/track, 1020 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1003 * 512 = 513536 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 ? 1914209 2457017 272218546+ 20 Unknown
Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(356, 97, 46) logical=(1914208, 5, 40)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(357, 116, 40) logical=(2457016, 16, 59)
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2 ? 1326206 1863570 269488144 6b Unknown
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(288, 110, 57) logical=(1326205, 9, 57)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(269, 101, 57) logical=(1863569, 13, 16)
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda3 ? 537378 1931558 699181456 53 OnTrack DM6 Aux3
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(345, 32, 19) logical=(537377, 4, 25)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(324, 77, 19) logical=(1931557, 10, 42)
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda4 * 1390457 1390478 10668+ 49 Unknown
Partition 4 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(87, 1, 0) logical=(1390456, 5, 1)
Partition 4 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(335, 78, 2) logical=(1390477, 9, 38)
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.
Partition table entries are not in disk order
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 20:29 rfc: test whether a device has a partition table Andries.Brouwer
2003-09-24 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-24 23:50 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-25 0:05 ` viro
2003-09-25 12:14 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-25 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-25 6:53 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-09-25 10:57 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-25 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-25 4:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-25 11:42 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-10-05 9:00 ` Meelis Roos
2003-09-25 0:42 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-09-25 1:00 ` viro
2003-09-25 1:27 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-22 11:18 Uwe Bonnes
2004-05-22 12:37 ` John Bradford
2004-05-22 12:56 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-05-22 15:14 ` Uwe Bonnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F72447C.4000909@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.