From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Carrying Attributes too Far Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:40:03 +0400 Message-ID: <3F726393.2040907@namesys.com> References: <1971720372-BeMail@cr593174-a> <1064280061.3f6f9ffd2c514@webmail.st-andrews.ac.uk> <3F71655B.4060704@namesys.com> <1064425945.3f71d9d905106@webmail.st-andrews.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1064425945.3f71d9d905106@webmail.st-andrews.ac.uk> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: lrc1@st-andrews.ac.uk Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com lrc1@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote: >Quoting Hans Reiser : > > >>lrc1@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote: >> >> >>>Quoting "Alexander G. M. Smith" : >>> >>> >>>>lrc1@st-andrews.ac.uk wrote on Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:28:30 +0100: >>>> >>>> > > > >>>I agree that attribute files should be files like any other. So attribute >>> >>> >>files >> >> >>>should certainly have the same linking and permissions rights as any other >>>file. >>> >>> >>> >>Why? Not at all, I would say. >> >> > >Short answer: because otherwise you have ""attributes" that cannot interact with >files in all the same ways that files can interact with files" ( >http://www.namesys.com/v4/v4.html ). > no, you just have different permission processing on different files. > > > >>>>- Alex >>>> >>>> >>-- >>Hans >> >> > >Leo. > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >University of St Andrews Webmail: http://webmail.st-andrews.ac.uk > > > > -- Hans