From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: simon@voxel.at (DI Dr Simon Vogl) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:19 +0000 Subject: Fw: linux-2.4/MAINTAINERS, i2c drivers Message-Id: <3F73DC39.3030805@voxel.at> List-Id: References: <1064476786.3f72a0728dbdb@imp.gcu.info> In-Reply-To: <1064476786.3f72a0728dbdb@imp.gcu.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi, well really, I have been quiet -- I finished my PhD in winter and several projects kept me busy. As I don't see much free time for me to restart active development in this area, I am perfectly happy with this change. Simon Jean Delvare wrote: > (Looks like simon@tk.uni-linz.ac.at doesn't work anymore.) > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:59:46 +0200 > From: Jean Delvare > To: Simon Vogl , Frodo Looijaard > > Cc: sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com, greg@kroah.com > Subject: linux-2.4/MAINTAINERS, i2c drivers > > > > Dear Simon and Frodo, > > I am planning to submit a patch to the MAINTAINERS file in Linux 2.4. > It seems that the "I2C DRIVERS" record is out of date. Frodo regularly > forwards mails to our mailing list. I haven't heard from Simon for > months. You both made remarkable work on Linux I2C layer, but maybe it's > time to update the record to point to active developers, lists and web > sites. It would ease communications between all actors, wouldn't it? > > I volunteer to be the new maintainer of the i2c subsystem in 2.4. Greg > is already doing a great job in 2.6. > > To the questions now: > > Is a record update OK? > > Are the following mailing list and web site still alive? > L: linux-i2c@pelican.tk.uni-linz.ac.at > W: http://www.tk.uni-linz.ac.at/~simon/private/i2c > Should they be kept in the record? > > Here is my proposal of new record. Please tell me what you do think > about it: > > I2C DRIVERS > P: Jean Delvare > M: khali@linux-fr.org > L: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com > W: http://www.lm-sensors.nu/ > S: Maintained > > Would it make sense to split the record into "I2C SUBSYSTEM" and "SENSOR > DRIVERS"? "I2C DRIVERS" doesn't really make sense, there are much more > I2C drivers in the kernel than just ours. On the other hand, we have > non-sensor drivers in our repository. > > Comments welcome. > > -- Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Simon Vogl ! http://www.voxel.at/ VoXel Interaction Design ! office@voxel.at Breitwiesergutstr. 50 ! +43 650 2323 555 A-4020 Linz - Austria !