From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@pld-linux.org>
Cc: Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB problem. 'irq 9: nobody cared!' (FIXED!)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:30:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F79D9E4.4060701@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309301141.18595.arekm@pld-linux.org>
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 25 of September 2003 21:11, David Brownell wrote:
>
>
>>The problem is that nobody has ever reported back with results from
>>testing any updated patch (see attachment, the guts of this being
>>from Alan Stern). Sort of makes trying be a moot point ... :)
>
> So I'm the first one? ;)
Since then I got mixed reports -- not sure I trust them.
> Your patch (http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0309.3/0341.html)
> FIXES things for me :-)
OK, that's good to hear. There are two patches that seem
to work to various degrees. This isn't the least conservative
fix (that'd be http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/9/29/74, returning
to that odd "reset before kicking bios off" sequence) but it's
good to know this also behaves.
- Dave
> This time I've tried 2.6.0test6 + all acpi patches from 2.6.0-mm1 (ls *acpi*
> in akpm broken-out directory) + your patch and things work fine :)
> Note that 2.6.0+all acpi patches from 2.6.0-mm1 without your patch doesn't
> work.
>
> [arekm@mobarm arekm]$ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 0: 698946 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 1712 XT-PIC i8042
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 3: 1561 XT-PIC irda0
> 5: 4 XT-PIC yenta
> 8: 0 XT-PIC rtc
> 9: 2657 XT-PIC acpi, eth0
> 10: 77708 XT-PIC VIA686A, uhci-hcd, uhci-hcd
> 12: 18 XT-PIC i8042
> 14: 12408 XT-PIC ide0
> 15: 20 XT-PIC ide1
> NMI: 0
> ERR: 0
>
> More details about my case in lkml archives and
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905
>
>
>>It's OK with me if you just revert the patch that adds a uhci_reset()
>>entry, but based on what I saw with EHCI and OHCI that'll just turn
>>up a different set of problems with certain BIOS configurations (none
>>of which I have) ... which will need to be fixed by having a UHCI
>>reset sequence that works correctly from _all_ initial states.
>>
>>- Dave
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 22:57 USB problem. 'irq 9: nobody cared!' Milton Miller
2003-09-25 4:23 ` Yaroslav Halchenko
2003-09-25 18:00 ` Greg KH
2003-09-25 19:11 ` David Brownell
2003-09-30 9:41 ` USB problem. 'irq 9: nobody cared!' (FIXED!) Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2003-09-30 19:30 ` David Brownell [this message]
2003-09-26 3:14 ` USB problem. 'irq 9: nobody cared!' Yaroslav Halchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F79D9E4.4060701@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=arekm@pld-linux.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=johannes@erdfelt.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.