From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Axel Christiansen Subject: Re: sugestion needed for session marking from different default routres Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:30:38 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3F7B1D4E.4090101@zedx.org> References: <34887.212.202.127.214.1065004876.squirrel@knex.zedx.net> <1065006374.870.59.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1065006374.870.59.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: Cedric Blancher Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Cedric Blancher schrieb: > Le mer 01/10/2003 =E0 12:41, Axel Christiansen a =E9crit : > [...] >=20 >>Now, ssh from inet on the DSL line works fine. The >>Pakets get back the right way by the active default >>route. I also want to ssh in over the other interface, >>and want the packets back in that line. >>I am thinking about marking the incoming packets and >>then finding out about the returning packets some how. >>If this would work, the routing then can by done by >>ip rule (routing). >=20 >=20 > You must have a look to CONNMARK target and connmark match that stands > in pom extra section : Great, that will work. thx, Axel