From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: phil@edgedesign.us (Philip Edelbrock) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:20 +0000 Subject: Some nice feature Message-Id: <3F7B3750.3070908@edgedesign.us> List-Id: References: <200310011619.49340.lepalom@wol.es> In-Reply-To: <200310011619.49340.lepalom@wol.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org I don't know. I could use a good book on XML for xmas. ;') Obviously flame bait. Libsensors is a decent API if it is looked into. Lm_sensors is the standard for hardware health monitoring in Linux. It's not nessesary to get in a war of words defending it's ease of application. If another project works better, then of course there is no harm if they go with that. Phil Jean Delvare wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I cannot avoid to send you a part of a mail that I have read in the >>beowulf list, we have talking about the option to use lmsensors to >>monitorizing the cluster with a cron command. Someone have said that >>is not a good option, so says: >> >>[....] >> >>What do you think? >> >> > >I think that cross-posting what could become a flame war is better >avoided. > >Apart from that, I believe that if that guy really wanted something >done, he would have told us directly, or even done it by himself. We >never heard about him, which means that he isn't interested in and/or >convinced by what he proposes, and we can safely ignore him. > > >