From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:23:27 +1200 From: Robin Gilks Subject: Re: Problem of concurrency in arch/ppc/8260_io/uart.c In-reply-to: <20031001223156.GC17768@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> To: Tom Rini , linuxppc mail list Message-id: <3F7B61EF.1030306@tait.co.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed References: <3F79A106.8010608@embeddededge.com> <3F417AA6-F41B-11D7-B134-000393DBC2E8@motorola.com> <20031001143243.GE12343@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <1065019736.9737.526.camel@hermes> <005801c38861$e7a596a0$020120b0@jockeXP> <20031001213239.GA17768@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <006001c38866$3017e560$020120b0@jockeXP> <20031001220048.GB17768@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <007a01c38869$c2287200$020120b0@jockeXP> <20031001223156.GC17768@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>>>>It's in the linuxppc-2.4 tree. I'll try and get it to Marcelo in time >>>>>for 2.4.21-pre7. >>>> >>>>Ahh, found it in http://ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc-2.4. I did look in >>>>http://ppc.bitkeeper.com:8080/linuxppc_2_4 but it is not there. Is this tree obsolete? >>> >>>It's not preferred, certainly. >> >>What about linuxppc_2_4_devel? Is that also "non preferred"? > > > Yes. Rather than lots of URLs that are NOT recommended, is there one that is? Also, you refer to 2.4.21-pre but I thought we had moved onto 2.4.23-pre now. Is the ppc tree really that much out-of-date? Very much in need of getting rid of the CPM memory leak in 2.4.21 so I have a very acute interest in getting the latest & greatest!! -- Robin Gilks Senior Design Engineer Phone: (+64)(3) 357 1569 Tait Electronics Fax : (+64)(3) 359 4632 PO Box 1645 Christchurch Email : robin.gilks@tait.co.nz New Zealand ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/