From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: ReiserFS on a USB memory stick?
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 08:58:13 +0400
Message-ID: <3F7E5365.5000506@namesys.com>
References: <20031003122455.1faa32fa.felix.klee.reiserfs@gmx.net>	<3F7DACAD.4060102@namesys.com> <20031003232435.5ec10a67.felix.klee.reiserfs@gmx.net> <3F7E518E.3060301@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15785-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <3F7E518E.3060301@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: "Felix E. Klee" <felix.klee.reiserfs@gmx.net>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, prt@gnu.org

I should also add, in regards to the article, if you are using XFS on 
Linux, it is not as stable as ext3 and reiserfs.  I think the article 
author doesn't understand just how much code gets changed during a 
port.  It took them years to do the port.  ReiserFS is more stable 
mostly because it was finished before the others (we worked pretty hard 
to make that happen).

-- 
Hans