From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Waychison Subject: Re: multiple servers per automount Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 15:00:14 -0400 Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F85B03E.2050109@sun.com> References: <6AB920CC10586340BE1674976E0A991D5955F1@slexch2.sugarland.unocal.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <6AB920CC10586340BE1674976E0A991D5955F1@slexch2.sugarland.unocal.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii" To: "Ogden, Aaron A." Cc: autofs mailing list , Ian Kent Ogden, Aaron A. wrote: >Ouch. As you may know, the limit is *much* lower in linux. Something >that I've been struggling with recently... > >Under normal circumstances I would not be concerned with 'limitations' >of a few hundred active NFS mounts, but such limitations certainly limit >scalability for the extreme cases. > > The maximum number of plain pseudo-block device filesystems on a given filesystem is limitted to 256. (This includes proc, autofs, nfs..). This is because pseudo-block filesystems all use major 0, and each have a different minor (thus the 256 limit). There are however patches floating around (look at SuSe's kernels, I'm not sure about RH) that allow n majors to be used (default 5). This gives you 1280 mounts, a big step up :) Mike Waychison