From: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>
To: "Ogden, Aaron A." <aogden@unocal.com>
Cc: autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, "Lever,
Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: multiple servers per automount
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:54:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F86D62C.9000102@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6AB920CC10586340BE1674976E0A991D0C6B7D@slexch2.sugarland.unocal.com>
Ogden, Aaron A. wrote:
>Aha! Wisdom from the heavens... :-)
>I assume that the RPC code is doing that to comply with reserved-port
>restrictions, ie. ports < 1024. Solaris needs to do the same thing
>(with nfssrv:nfs_portmon=1) so it seems that there would be an inherent
>limit of 1024 ports or mountpoints to work with. Actually less, since
>some ports will be in use. How does Sun get 260,000 active mounts if
>they can only use ports < 1024? Do we really need one port for each
>mountpoint?
>
>
Don't take my word for it, because I don't know any better.. But
Solaris may multiplex different NFS servers on the same udp port. They
may also have their tests done with TCP instead of udp, which solves
that problem elegantly.
>Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that solaris autofs is
>multithreaded (ie. one process) whereas linux autofs has many processes,
>one for each mountpoint. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong...
>
>
Nah, this sounds alot like an NFS issue. See Charles Lever's post.
Mike Waychison
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-10 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 15:43 [NFS] Re: multiple servers per automount Ogden, Aaron A.
2003-10-10 15:54 ` Mike Waychison [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-14 13:37 RE: [autofs] " Ian Kent
2003-10-14 15:52 ` [NFS] " Mike Waychison
2003-10-10 17:02 [NFS] " Eric Werme USG
2003-10-10 15:16 Ogden, Aaron A.
2003-10-13 3:23 ` [NFS] " Ian Kent
2003-10-14 7:05 ` Joseph V Moss
2003-10-10 15:10 Re: [autofs] " Lever, Charles
2003-10-13 3:05 ` [NFS] " Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F86D62C.9000102@sun.com \
--to=michael.waychison@sun.com \
--cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
--cc=aogden@unocal.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.