From: James de Lurker <jtl2nospamMUNGIEjump@hotmail.com>
To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [patch] 2.6.0-test7-selinux1
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:43:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F89E737.7090004@hotmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1065712103.8181.266.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil
On 09 Oct 2003 at 11:08:23 UT -0400 Stephen Smalley wrote:
> 2.6.0-test7 has been released and includes the following SELinux-related
> changes:
[..]
> Patch against 2.6.0-test7 follows.
I just can't get this to apply cleanly. I assume that the reference here is
the standard kernel.org linux-2.6.0-test7 ?
I copied the patch out of the email to a patch file, as below
Testing with:
patch -p0 --verbose --dry-run <2.6.0-test7-selinux1-list.patch
>260t7patch-KORef.txt 2>&1
It complains in these places:
[..]
|Index: linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c
|diff -u linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c:1.1.1.2
linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c:1.35
|--- linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c:1.1.1.2 Mon Aug 25 10:58:08 2003
|+++ linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c Wed Sep 24 12:15:25 2003
--------------------------
Patching file linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 FAILED at 575.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
linux-2.6/security/selinux/avc.c.rej
[..]
|Index: linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
|diff -u linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c:1.1.1.3
linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c:1.32
|--- linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c:1.1.1.3 Mon Sep 29
09:14:40 2003
|+++ linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c Fri Oct 3 16:01:16 2003
--------------------------
Patching file linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 FAILED at 37.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 126 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 609.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
linux-2.6/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c.rej
[..]
Patching file linux-2.6/security/selinux/ss/policydb.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 225.
Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage.
done
Advise please. I'm about to build another trial system, and would prefer
to try out the later test7 kernel if possible. Target system is an i586
box with a command line only upgraded install of RedHat 9. Desktop system
used for patching and configuring kernels is a RedHat 7.2 box.
--
-- James
From and Reply To are INVALID.
All public postings use munged headers[1]- To contact me off list:
1) Remove "M U N G I E j u m p" ONLY: leave that "nospam" in there!
2) change "hotmail" 2 "myrealbox" after the @
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-12 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-09 15:08 [patch] 2.6.0-test7-selinux1 Stephen Smalley
2003-10-12 23:43 ` James de Lurker [this message]
2003-10-14 14:32 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F89E737.7090004@hotmail.com \
--to=jtl2nospammungiejump@hotmail.com \
--cc=see.the.sig.2.reply.by.email.offlist@hotmail.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.