From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from myware.akkadia.org (cpe-24-221-190-179.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.190.179]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0F548AC for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:13:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3F8CD774.4040400@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:13:24 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Carlos O'Donell" Cc: libc-alpha , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org References: <20031010204444.GF6454@systemhalted> In-Reply-To: <20031010204444.GF6454@systemhalted> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH] linuxthreads for hppa (1/3) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think I've asked this before: > Use __LT_INITIALIZER_NOT_ZERO instead of __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT. Why? No unnecessary changes. guardaddr)) > +# else > while (h->h_descr == NULL > - || ! (sp <= (char *) h->h_descr->p_stackaddr && sp >= h->h_bottom)) > + || ! (sp <= (char *) h->h_descr->p_stackaddr && sp >= (char *) h->h_bottom)) > +# endif No unnecessary changes. Leave the code you're not using alone. > h++; > # else > - while (! (sp <= (char *) h->h_descr && sp >= h->h_bottom)) > +# ifdef _STACK_GROWS_UP And again. - -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/jNd02ijCOnn/RHQRAl6CAJ0Tv6yItJOX52RZu71GKSrGFUfMtACgnf6i Jy0mt+OERsR8N35JOFozwPU= =kNiu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----