From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from myware.akkadia.org (cpe-24-221-190-179.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.190.179]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64614892 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:37:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3F8D85B9.8090504@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:36:57 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Carlos O'Donell" Cc: libc-alpha , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org References: <20031010204444.GF6454@systemhalted> <3F8CD774.4040400@redhat.com> <20031015054045.GE22495@systemhalted> <3F8CE195.2090106@redhat.com> <20031015142648.GF22495@systemhalted> In-Reply-To: <20031015142648.GF22495@systemhalted> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH] linuxthreads for hppa (1/3) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Ulrich, > > >>- -# if __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT != 0 >>- - __pthread_handles[0].h_lock = __LOCK_INITIALIZER; >>- - __pthread_handles[1].h_lock = __LOCK_INITIALIZER; >>+# ifdef __LT_INITIALIZER_NOT_ZERO >>+ __pthread_handles[0].h_lock = __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER; >>+ __pthread_handles[1].h_lock = __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER; >> >>part is what I meant. There is no reason to change the name. > > > How do you propose it be handled? All arches define __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT I'm talking about this __LOCK_INITIALIZER -> __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER change. Why do you claim the right to rename the symbol? - -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/jYW52ijCOnn/RHQRAsmEAJ0cmMRxfMlyduuTG9TQMnATJVRJQQCgu/Vy aL6qdcssSoUjY7D7oCnKXII= =VzEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----