From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262798AbTJPIiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:38:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262799AbTJPIiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:38:12 -0400 Received: from dyn-ctb-210-9-241-190.webone.com.au ([210.9.241.190]:25099 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262798AbTJPIiJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:38:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3F8E58A9.20005@cyberone.com.au> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:36:57 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Billauer CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] frandom - fast random generator module References: <3F8E552B.3010507@users.sf.net> In-Reply-To: <3F8E552B.3010507@users.sf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eli Billauer wrote: > Hello, > > Frandom is the faster version of the well-known /dev/urandom random > number generator. Not instead of, but rather as a supplement, when > pseudorandom data is needed at high rate. Few tests so far show that > frandom is 10-50 times faster than urandom. > Hi > > Test results and comments will be appreciated. > Without looking at the code, why should this be done in the kernel?