From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262864AbTJPLb7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:31:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262865AbTJPLb7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:31:59 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:49800 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262864AbTJPLb6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:31:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3F8E819F.1040103@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:31:43 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brian@worldcontrol.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SI 3112 vs SI 3114 SATA Controller References: <20031015210455.GA29805@top.worldcontrol.com> In-Reply-To: <20031015210455.GA29805@top.worldcontrol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org brian@worldcontrol.com wrote: > I seem every once in a while I see discussion of the Silicon Image > 3112 based SATA controller. My motherboard, Tyan S2885, reports back > that I have a 3114. The SI web sites boasts 20 manufacturers are now > incorporating the 3114 version of the chip. > > Has anyone had any experience with the SI 3114? 3114 kicks much more ass than 3112, but the driver is still being written...