From: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault?
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:28:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F92AD98.3030104@tiscali.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F91ACEC.1010504@tiscali.be>
Too bad,
The pb re-occurs also with 2.4.21-32 but this time during two kernels
(2.4.22 && 2.6) was build at the same time. When 2.6 was finished, I can
re-launch evolution without pb. Could it be a pb of swap? How may check
if its limits were reach at this moment?
Thanks,
Joel
Joel Soete wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> I just reboot my C110 but with a kernel 2.4.21-32 and evolution works
> fine. OTC with k2.6 still failled. I will try to see later what is wrong :(
>
> Thanks again,
> Joel
>
>
> Joel Soete wrote:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> I just haven't such hw at my office where otc i can do some other
>> check on
>> the b2k model.
>>
>> On this b2k (also installed with unstable debian) run fine the same
>> release
>> of evolution (otc what i said).
>> But it is booted with last 2.4 (a merge of 23-pre7 and 22-pa12) with 256M
>> of ram (only 128k for c110) and without mozilla-psm (a recommended or
>> suggested
>> additional pkg added on c110).
>>
>> So a lot of test to figure out the present pb :)
>>
>> Thanks a lot ( I will advise you :) )
>> Joel
>>
>>
>>> -- Original Message --
>>> From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
>>> To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
>>> Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
>>> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:02:02 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote:
>>> Hello Carlos,
>>>
>>> I launch 'gbd evolution'
>>> (gdb) run
>>> to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message:
>>> Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>>
>>>
>>> what's your opinion?
>>
>>
>>
>> That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working.
>> You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb.
>>
>> Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid>
>>
>>> maps and the dying address to
>>
>>
>> calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name.
>>
>> c.
>> _______________________________________________
>> parisc-linux mailing list
>> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
>> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman
>>
>>> listinfo/parisc-linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro
>> pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> parisc-linux mailing list
>> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
>> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parisc-linux mailing list
> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-19 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 22:17 [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? Joel Soete
2003-10-12 18:16 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-12 18:42 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-12 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-13 11:44 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-18 21:13 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-19 15:28 ` Joel Soete [this message]
2003-10-19 19:49 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Joel Soete
2003-10-19 23:10 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-21 6:24 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-01 23:27 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-02 20:22 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-11-03 9:11 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-11-08 21:11 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 22:09 ` [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect Carlos O'Donell
2003-11-08 22:36 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 22:33 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Grant Grundler
2003-11-09 0:11 ` Joel Soete
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F92AD98.3030104@tiscali.be \
--to=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
--cc=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.