From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: new reiser4 snapshot Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 00:41:49 +0200 Message-ID: <3F93132D.70206@gmx.net> References: <3F92D35D.3090806@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3F92D35D.3090806@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Nishant Sharma , Nikita Danilov , Reiserfs mail-list Hans Reiser wrote: > Nishant Sharma wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Nikita Danilov wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> Reiser4 snapshot against 2.6.0-test7 has been released: >>> http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.10.17/ >>> Description is in http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.10.17/READ.ME >>> >> Following is the relevant section of my .config in kernel src-dir. >> >> CONFIG_REISER4_FS=m >> # CONFIG_REISER4_FS_SYSCALL is not set >> # CONFIG_REISER4_LARGE_KEY is not set I thought CONFIG_REISER4_LARGE_KEY was force-enabled by now? >> # CONFIG_REISER4_CHECK is not set >> CONFIG_REISER4_USE_EFLUSH=y >> # CONFIG_REISER4_COPY_ON_CAPTURE is not set >> # CONFIG_REISER4_BADBLOCKS is not set >> >> What am I doing wrong? I believe that I followed the instructions >> in http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.10.17/READ.ME to the letter. >> >> > Nikita, please determine why reiser4 tells users they can configure it > as a module when they cannot. Carl-Daniel