From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: (reiser4 name) Re: Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4?
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:14:29 +0300
Message-ID: <3F9E2565.6030100@namesys.com>
References: <20031028024209.GO8540@pegasys.ws> <3F9E1ABD.1050004@namesys.com> <20031028073300.GQ8540@pegasys.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15916-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20031028073300.GQ8540@pegasys.ws>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
Cc: Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM>

jw schultz wrote:

>On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:01AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
>  
>
>>You mount it as reiser4, which is why in writing documentation I get 
>>torn between calling it ReiserFS V4 and Reiser4.
>>    
>>
>
>Whether the length was intentional or not, thanks.
>Sorry about the subject line, sloppiness on my part.
>
>  
>
It was based on mailing list feedback that they knew it was an FS.

-- 
Hans