From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEd3k-0000fq-Gw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:15:32 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AEd36-0000Mg-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:15:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1AEd33-0000Lm-FG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:14:49 -0500 Received: from [193.252.22.29] (helo=mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AEd0m-0003EQ-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:12:28 -0500 Received: from free.fr (ATuileries-112-1-1-209.w80-11.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.11.167.209]) by mwinf0201.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AEDEF30005B5 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:12:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3F9EF7F6.8070607@free.fr> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:12:54 +0100 From: Fabrice Bellard MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Math/FP problems in 0.5.0? References: <1067319999.1257.9.camel@shawn.local> In-Reply-To: <1067319999.1257.9.camel@shawn.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org My last commits should fix the issue. Fabrice. Leigh Dyer wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing with both CVS and the 0.5.0 release of qemu today, > using a debian system that I installed under bochs. The system boots and > seems to run quite well, but I noticed some numerical problems showing > up - e2fsck's percentage meter switched between 0.0% and nan%, and > running nbench produced similar results, with either 0 or nan for all > reported values in the output. > > I thought that it might be a problem with my toolchain (gcc 3.3 in > Debian unstable messes things up, so I use unstable's gcc 3.2), so I > grabbed the qemu binary and linux test image from the website. Running > df seems to show the problem as well: the Capacity of the filesystem is > shown as 0%, and if you use df -h, Size, Used and Avail all show as 0G. > > Apart from that, I have to say that 0.5.0 is very impressive - keep up > the good work :) > > Thanks > Leigh