From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Lost Files Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:44:32 +0300 Message-ID: <3F9FA820.80208@namesys.com> References: <200310290906.h9T96nsO020624@mail02.webpoint.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200310290906.h9T96nsO020624@mail02.webpoint.co.at> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: Alexander Waller Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, webmaster@webpoint.at Alexander Waller wrote: >Hi ! >Yesterday it was the third time I lost important files on a >reiserfs-partition. >This time I had a reasonable backup. >So i could minimize the time my server was offline. >I use S.u.S.E 8.2. >The first to times reiserfsck was not able to repair any file. I found all >of them in the directory /lost+found, but that was not good for me. ( 11000 >files there ) >This time about 5000 files were in /lost+found and the rest in the right >place. > >Is this a normal behavior or do you think I have a hardware problem ? >Is the S.u.S.E implementation wrong ? >Shall I change to ext3 ? ( It=B4s slower, I know ) > >Whats the right strategie to recover a defetive partition ? > >Alex. > > > =20 > It is not normal. It is very likely to be hardware. --=20 Hans