From: Chris Ellec <cellec@celerity.net>
To: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: jffs2 vs NFTL
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:14:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA0119A.9020003@celerity.net> (raw)
A couple years ago I developped a system wih DOC using [N]FTL and an
ext2 file system which was working fine.
Now I have a new project where we'll use JFFS2 for reliability instead
of ext2, but I am confused as to the relationship between JFFS2 and NFTL.
For example the help provided in the Configuration steps says that
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS is not needed for Diskonchip, however
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/nand.html
says that the same flag is needed for JFFS2
Does that mean that the JFFS2 driver does not use the NFTL driver ? What
about the new chips that need the INFTL driver ?
Chris.
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-29 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-29 19:14 Chris Ellec [this message]
2003-10-30 11:52 ` jffs2 vs NFTL David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA0119A.9020003@celerity.net \
--to=cellec@celerity.net \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.