Re: 2.6.0-test9-mjb1

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>]

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> The patchset contains mainly scalability and NUMA stuff, and anything 
> else that stops things from irritating me. It's meant to be pretty stable, 
> not so much a testing ground for new stuff.
> 
> I'd be very interested in feedback from anyone willing to test on any 
> platform, however large or small.
> 
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/2.6.0-test9/patch-2.6.0-test9-mjb1.bz2
> 
> Since 2.6.0-test8-mjb1 (~ = changed, + = added, - = dropped)
> 
> Notes: 
> 	Mostly a merge forwards.
> 
> Now in Linus' tree:
> 
> Dropped:
> 
> New:
> 
> + autoswap					Con Kolivas
> 	Auto-tune swapiness
> 
> + ext2_fix					Andrew Morton
> 	Fix a race in ext2
> 
> Pending:
> lotsa_sds
> config_numasched
> 4/4 split
> new kgdb
> list_of_lists
> Hyperthreaded scheduler (Ingo Molnar)
> scheduler callers profiling (Anton or Bill Hartner)
> Child runs first (akpm)
> Kexec
> e1000 fixes


Um...   any e1000 fixes you have, please forward them to me and Intel 
rather than letting them languish in a tree.

	Jeff