From: George G. Davis <davis_g@comcast.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:49:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA17942.6080001@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71555548814716479478431542AA5F8A058F73@dlee2k98.ent.ti.com>
Matthew,
I'll send you the BDI config files off list.
If anyone else would like a copy, just let me know.
--
Regards,
George
Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> I corresponded with a couple people who use bdi2000 on omap. If you read
> around on some news archives you will find them. George Davis is one who
> comes to mind.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard W.
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Matthew S. McClintock [mailto:mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu]
>>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:37 PM
>>To: Woodruff, Richard
>>Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>>
>>
>>Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development
>>board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch
>>to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on
>>Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is
>>support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if
>>anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Matthew
>>
>>On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
>>
>>>The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510. I have
>>
>>seen a doc
>>
>>>somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
>>>
>>>Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested
>>
>>and sorted.
>>
>>>The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a
>>
>>168MHx part.
>>
>>>The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to
>>
>>150MHz, but its
>>
>>>likely many will run at 168. The 1510 also "claims"
>>
>>support for some
>>
>>>functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having. The issue
>>>there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be
>>
>>validated for
>>
>>>everything a 1510 will be.
>>>
>>>I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.
>>
>>I use their
>>
>>>u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back
>>
>>to 150MHz
>>
>>>as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as
>>
>>5910 not
>>
>>>1510.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Richard W.
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>[mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf
>>>>Of Matthew S. McClintock
>>>>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
>>>>To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I
>>>>understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does
>>>>anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are
>>
>>different?
>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Matthew
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>>>>Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
>>>>help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>>>YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>>>>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does
>>>SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
>>>help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>>YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>U-Boot-Users mailing list
>>>U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>>
>>--
>>Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm@arlut.utexas.edu>
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-30 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-30 20:41 [U-Boot-Users] omap5910 Woodruff, Richard
2003-10-30 20:49 ` George G. Davis [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-30 19:55 Woodruff, Richard
2003-10-30 20:37 ` Matthew S. McClintock
2003-10-30 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-10-30 21:00 ` George G. Davis
2003-10-30 19:29 Matthew S. McClintock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA17942.6080001@comcast.net \
--to=davis_g@comcast.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.