From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rohit Kumar Mehta Subject: Re: simple port forwarding question Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:12:08 -0500 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3FA66238.4070500@engr.uconn.edu> References: <20031103140723.2238.qmail@web40206.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: SBlaze Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Sorry, maybe I tried to distill the problem too much ;-) The short answer is no they are seperate machines. The first machine 192.168.28.2 is a Windows 2000 Active Directory (working as the kerberos 5 KDC), and the second machine (which I am running iptables on) is a Debian GNU/Linux system running kernel 2.4.22. Rohit SBlaze wrote: >I think you left out one important bit of information here. Are these two ips >on the same box? ( ie .1 on eth0 and .3 eth1 ) If they are I think it would >mean all the world of difference for your ruleset. you might be using the NAT >table when FOWARD lines in your filter table would sufice... > >just a guess... > >SBlaze > >===== >In the absence of order there will be chaos. > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears >http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ > >