From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com>,
Paul Venezia <pvenezia@jpj.net>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3 performance inconsistencies, 2.4/2.6
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:00:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA82161.9000507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311041335200.20373-100000@home.osdl.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Don't ask me why. But I'm cc'ing Uli, who can probably tell us. Maybe the
> RH-9 libraries are just not very good, and LinuxThreads has had a lot
> longer to optimize their lock behaviour..
I don't see any verison numbers mentioned. If you want to benchmark
NPTL use the recent code, e.g., from Fedora Core 1 or RHEL3. Nothing
else makes any sense since there have mean countless changes since the
early releases.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/qCFh2ijCOnn/RHQRApi1AKCaU7vBtJsATDmx2dStMYishtbF9wCaAvOe
kNaoizj4xtUNU4TV2wH5GAw=
=0kb0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-04 19:10 ext3 performance inconsistencies, 2.4/2.6 Paul Venezia
2003-11-04 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 20:20 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-04 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 21:07 ` Paul Venezia
2003-11-04 21:28 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-04 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 22:00 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2003-11-04 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-04 23:48 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-11-04 23:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-05 0:58 ` jlnance
2003-11-05 7:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-11-04 22:19 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-04 22:26 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-11-05 7:14 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-11-04 21:39 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA82161.9000507@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=brugolsky@telemetry-investments.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pvenezia@jpj.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.